Постанархизм - Сол Ньюман Страница 42

Caygill, H. (2013) On Resistance: A Philosophy of Defi ance. London: Bloomsbury.

Clastres, P. (2010) Archaeology of Violence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dean, J. (2010) Blog Theory: Feedback and Capture in the Circuits of the Drive. Cambridge: Polity.

Dean, J. (2012) The Communist Horizon. London: Verso.

Deleuze, G. (1992) ‘Postscript on the Societies of Control’, October, 59 (winter): 3–7.

Deleuze, G., and Negri, A. (1995) ‘Control and Becoming’, in G. Deleuze, Negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 169–76.

Ellul, J. (1965) The Technological Society, trans. J. Wilkinson. London: Jonathan Cape.

Flathman, R. E. (1998) Refl ections of a Would-Be Anarchist: Ideals and Institutions of Liberalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Flathman, R. E. (2003) Freedom and its Conditions: Discipline, Autonomy, and Resistance. New York: Rout-ledge.

Foucault, M. (1988) ‘Truth, Power, Self: An Interview with Michel Foucault’ (October 25), in Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Foucault, ed. L. H. Martin, H. Gutman and P. H. Hutton. London: Tavistock, pp. 9–15.

Foucault, M. (1996) ‘What is Critique?’, trans. K. P. Geiman, in What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions, ed. J. Schmidt. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 382–98.

Foucault, M. (2000a) ‘Omnes et singulatim: Toward a Critique of Political Reason’, in Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, ed. J. Faubion, trans. R. Hurley et al. London: Penguin, pp. 298–325.

Foucault, M. (2000b) ‘The Subject and Power’, in Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, ed. J. Faubion, trans. R. Hurley et al. London: Penguin, pp. 326–48.

Foucault, M. (2000c) ‘The Ethics of the Concern for the Self as a Practice of Freedom’, in Ethics: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol. 1, ed. P. Rabinow, trans. R. Hurley et al. London: Penguin, pp. 281–302.

Foucault, M. (2014) On the Government of the Living: Lectures at the Collège de France 1979–80, ed. M. Senellart, trans. G. Burchell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Foucault, M., and Sassine, F. (1979) ‘Entretien inéditavec Michel Foucault’, http://fares-sassine.blogspot.fr/2014/08/entretien-inedit-avec-michel-foucault.html.

Godwin, W. (1968) Anarchist Writings, ed. P. Marshall. London: Freedom Press.

Graeber, D. (2002) ‘The New Anarchists’, New Left Review 13 (Jan – Feb): 61–73.

Hessel, S. (2011) Time for Outrage! trans. D. Searls with A. Arrikha. London: Quartet Books.

Illich, I. (1985) Tools for Conviviality. London: Boyars.

Invisible Committee (2009) The Coming Insurrection. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

Kant, I. (1991a) ‘Theory and Practice: Part II’, in Political Writings, ed. H. Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–87.

Kant, I. (1991b) ‘What is Enlightenment?’, in Political Writings, ed. H. Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–60.

La Boétie, E. de (2008) The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude, trans. H. Kurz, ed. M. Roth-bard. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

Laclau, E. (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

Laclau, E., and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, trans. W. Moore and P. Cammack. London: Verso.

Landauer, G. (2010) ‘Weak State, Weaker People’, Revolution and Other Writings: A Political Reader, ed. and trans. G. Kuhn. Oakland, CA: PM Press, pp. 213–14.

Lazzarato, M. (2014) Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity, trans. J. D. Jordan. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

Lechte, J., and Newman, S. (2013) Agamben and the Politics of Human Rights: Statelessness, Images, Violence. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Lefort, C. (1988) Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

Zaccai, E. (2010) ‘Sustainable De-growth: Mapping the Context, Criticisms and Future Prospects of an Emergent Paradigm’, Ecological Economics 69: 1741–7.

Mouffe, C. (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.

Nancy, J.-L. (1993) The Experience of Freedom, trans. B. McDonald. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Negri, A. (1999) Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State, trans. M. Boscagli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Newman, S. (2001) From Bakunin to Lacan: Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Newman, S. (2011) Max Stirner. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rousseau, J.-J. (1987) ‘Discourse on the Origin of Inequality’, in Basic Political Writings, trans. D. A. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 25–81.

Schürmann, R. (1986) ‘On Constituting Oneself an Anarchist Subject’, Praxis International 6(3): 294–310.

Schürmann, R. (1987) Heidegger on Being and Acting: From Principles to Anarchy, trans. C.-M. Gros. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Vaccaro, S. (2013) ‘Critique of Static Ontology and Becoming Anarchy’, trans. J. Cohn, Anarchist Developments in Cultural Studies 2: 121–37.

Wolff, R. P. (1970) In Defense of Anarchism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Сноски

1

Бовуар С. де. Зрелость. – М.: Издательство «Э», 2018, с. 279, 285–287 и др.

2

Рябов П. В. Философия постклассического анархизма – terra incognita для историко-философских исследований (к постановке проблемы) // Преподаватель XXI век. № 3, 2009, с. 289–297.

3

Рябов П. В. Петр Кропоткин и Алексей Боровой /Анархизм: от Прудона до новейшего российского анархизма. – М.: Ленанд, 2020. с. 174 (504 с.)

4

Степин В. С. Философия науки. Общие проблемы. – М.: Гардарики, 2006, с. 267–308.

5

Рябов П. В. Философия постклассического анархизма – terra incognita для историко-философских исследований (к постановке проблемы)// Преподаватель XXI век. № 3, 2009, с. 293.

6

May, Todd (1994). The Political Philosophy of Poststructuralist Anarchism. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

7

Call, Lewis (2002). Postmodern Anarchism. Lexington: Lexington Books.

8

Newman, Saul (2001). From Bakunin to Lacan. Anti-Authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power. Lexington: Lexington Books.

9

Поляков Д. Б. «Идентичность субъекта в философии анархизма». Дис. канд. филос. наук: 09.00.11. Защита: 26.12.2016; утверждение: 10.07.2017. Чита, 2016. – 178 с.; «Постанархизм. Субъект в пространстве власти». – Чита: ЗабИЖТ, 2019. – 196 с.

10

Некоторые из них были опубликованы в рамках проекта Akrateia.info.

11

Один из главных образов-концептов М. Штирнера в трактате «Единственный и Его собственность».

12

«Kratos» – власть (греч.).

13

От «science» – наука, букв.: власть науки, культ науки (англ.).